Jack H. Framke, 1920-2012

I received news a few weeks ago that my organ teacher, Jack Framke, passed away in Glendale, Arizona, on February 29. (I almost wrote “former organ teacher,” but then I realized that in many ways, Jack continues to teach me how to make music.)

I started piano lessons early in school (in first grade, I think, but my mother remembered it as second grade, and I’m reluctant to question her recall). Performing in recitals and talent shows were important parts of my growing up. I enjoyed playing, but I have never had a lot of discipline and I was never very good at practicing.

We had a piano at the house, and for many years a Hammond C-2, which was eventually replaced by a B-3. But although I was able to bang out a tune on the organ, I never really knew how to play it–and in my early years my feet couldn’t reach the pedals anyway. Eventually, though, I followed my sister Judy in taking lessons from Jack Framke.

By that time I had learned most of the basics of reading music, and I was somewhat surprised at my first lesson when Jack put a simplified piece of music in front of me: it had a single staff with a key signature, a time signature, a one-note melody line, and some unusual markings above the melody line. He explained that these were the chords: I was to play the main chord notes (the tonic and dominant notes, I later learned) on the pedals, the chords on the lower keyboard with my left hand, and the melody on the upper keyboard with my right hand.

I didn’t know the term at the time, but what he was teaching me was how to play from a lead sheet, and that instruction was very different from the more classical training I had received as a piano student. It’s the basis for the way jazz and pop musicians play, and it literally changed my musical life. Jack taught me chord theory, and chord substitutions, and how to figure out the underlying chord structure of a piece of traditionally-written music.

Over the next five years, I worked closely with Jack, eventually demonstrating for the local Hammond distributor in a teenaged organ ensemble called the Metro-Gnomes (groan). One year, the Metro-Gnomes played at the Chicagoland Music Festival at Soldier Field, which remains the largest audience I have ever performed for and gave me the opportunity to meet bandleaders Pete Fountain and Wayne King. Jack also helped me prepare my entry in the 1965 organ competition at the Illinois State Fair. (My splashy arrangement of “Seventy-six Trombones” came in second to a performance of Bach’s “Toccata and Fugue in D-Minor.”) When the chorus at St. Patrick High School needed an organist, I tried out for the job and got it. (Not that there was a lot of competition. This gig typically meant playing about two songs a year: the rest of the time, I joined the baritones while John “Chisels” Larsen accompanied on the piano.) Meanwhile, one thing led to another, because if it had a keyboard, Jack could teach it. He had piano students, and he also taught the vibraphone, marimba, and xylophone, on which the player uses mallets to strike bars arranged like keys. So when St. Pat’s got ready in 1966 to stage its first musical and the music director decided I should play percussion (!) in the orchestra, Jack supplemented the organ lessons with mallet lessons for a few months, and I was able to play nine instruments in the percussion session for our production of Oliver! As with so many things, this had a lasting influence. I decided I liked musicals: in my senior year, St. Pat’s staged a musical called Fiorello, and this time I was in the cast. Not only were these shows important to me socially, they helped shape my career. In college, I became an accompanist for the John Carroll University Glee Club, applying some of the lead-sheet techniques on the piano. During my senior year of college, at the interview that led to my first teaching job, the principal looked over my list of school activities. He noted that I had been a newspaper editor and had performed in shows, and asked which I would be interested in: advising the school paper or directing the school musicals. (“Neither” wasn’t an option.) I chose the musicals, and began a career in which I directed hundreds of students in over thirty plays and musicals. That career likely wouldn’t have happened if I hadn’t played the xylophone in a school musical, using lessons improbably provided by my organ teacher. The organ lessons had ended when I reached my senior year of high school and prepared to move to Cleveland. I began my own adult life and wondered occasionally about my old organ teacher, but I never acted on those wonderings: never tried the old number in Chicago or called at Jack and Irene’s apartment on Belmont. But about twenty years ago, I used some new thing called the “World Wide Web” to do a search, and found a Jack Framke living in Arizona. I knew that after Irene and music, Jack’s next love was golf, and that they play a lot of golf in Arizona. I took a chance and got in touch, and found out that the Jack Framke living in Glendale, Arizona, was indeed my old organ teacher. We corresponded and exchanged Christmas cards for years, and in February 2010 I visited Jack and Irene in Glendale with my sister and brother-in-law, Jane and John. At nearly 90, Jack was still playing and still teaching. He had lost none of his energy and none of his enthusiasm for music, and he delighted in demonstrating the capabilities of some pretty sophisticated modern digital organs and keyboards. He was still playing golf just about every day, and when he took us to lunch at his country club, everybody knew who he was. I learned at our luncheon that Jack had gone to Lane Tech High School in Chicago, and had played saxophone in the jazz band there. He worked with a few bands out of high school and eventually used what he learned from that experience to start teaching students. So his own musical training was based more on playing than on studying. I’ve done most of my own adult music-making in churches, not clubs. I play the piano more than the organ, and the organs I do play are a far cry from the Hammond B-3 we had at home. But when I work out chords with guitarists, transpose a song to make it easier for the congregation to sing, or improvise an extension of a hymn, I’m using skills that Jack taught me. I am grateful to have known him, and to have had the opportunity to get back in touch with him so many years later.

Talk Radio

I called in recently to a radio program called The Sound of Ideas, heard on Cleveland Public Radio, WCPN-FM 90.3, weekdays 9:00-10:00. Since then the producer called asking me to appear on today’s show, “Money, Politics and Unions after Issue 2,” and I agreed to be a guest. Other members of the panel–all much heavier hitters than me–were:
  • Harriet Applegate of the North Shore AFL-CIO, with us in the studio;
  • by phone, Peter Overby, NPR’s “Power, Money and Influence” correspondent, who covers campaign finance;
  • by phone, Mark Mix, President of the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation.
If you’re masochistic, you might enjoy downloading the show’s podcast. If you’re really adventurous, watch the video; if you can take it, so can I.

So how was this experience, you ask? Well, I learned stage fright young: as a music student I would be a complete basket case before each recital. And although by now I’ve spoken, acted, sung, played, or taught thousands of times, I’m still pretty nervous before anything that resembles a performance.

One surprise to me was how quickly the hour went. I had prepared for the session, and had my various papers arranged in front of me at the desk. I wound up hardly referring to any of them, and instead used the top handout mostly to take notes and keep track of my thoughts. In this setting, it seems, it does no good to anticipate what the next question might be or to dwell on the last one: the most important thing is to concentrate on the moment. In little league they called it “keeping your head in the game,” and it’s not something I was or am especially good at; but for an hour at a time, I guess I can.
With stage fright goes that delicious feeling when it’s over, and by 10:00 I was feeling pretty relieved. I’d do it again: the risk of sounding stupid is a worthwhile price to pay for the opportunity to do something you believe in.

Ideas Matter

Ohioans go to the polls tomorrow to determine the fate of Senate Bill 5, which aimed to replace public employee collective bargaining with collective begging. In a series which ends today, I’ve been writing about “three things that matter.” I’ve been working backward from the observation that leadership–particularly local union leadership–matters, and that this was made clearer by this year, in which our members have learned to their sorrow just how much elections matter. Today, I’m writing about the most basic of these: ideas matter.

III. Ideas Matter.

Our leaders and our members had to do such heroic work this year (leadership matters) because we face a political foe who has made it his business to destroy public employee unions (elections matter). But our political foes couldn’t get much traction if they hadn’t been winning an ideological fight for many years. If we can’t figure out how to win that fight, then all the elections and all the organizing in the world won’t save us.

Virtually no intervention prescribed to improve public schools has worked. Charter schools, vouchers, high-stakes testing, merit pay, take your pick–none have worked. American schools continue to be victimized by capricious and inequitable funding, inconsistent academic standards, and indifferent community support. And yet, despite an almost total lack of evidence that they work, each of the interventions I’ve mentioned has its fervent adherents.

All of this would simply be a continuing, nagging aggravation except for the biggest wrong idea of them all–the conversion of public education from a common good to a commodity.

In the late nineties, when the Ohio General Assembly passed the Cleveland “scholarship” (voucher) program, the argument was that the Cleveland schools were in such miserable shape that anything that could be done to help them should be done. But today’s school choice advocates are beyond choice for failing schools. In March, Republican Senate hopeful Josh Mandel, talking to a school choice group on the steps of the Statehouse last spring, argued that taxpayers should pay for whatever education choice parents make, a concept which is embodied in House Bill 136.

HB 136 is the logical fruit of the ideological tree planted in the establishment of the Cleveland voucher program: although it is need-based, it would permit most parents to take tax support and apply it to any school of their choice.

Ohio’s Constitution requires the General Assembly to “secure a thorough and efficient system of common schools throughout the state” (6.02). The DeRolph suit was about whether Ohio school funding provided a “thorough and efficient” system; HB 136 makes that question irrelevent by forgoing common schools altogether and making education a tax-supported consumer purchase.

Ideas matter. This one is probably the worst idea going, and it has bipartisan support: Representatives Bill Patmon (D- Cleveland) and Michael Stinziano (D-Columbus) are co-sponsors. It has a chance of being passed because the public generally doesn’t understand the importance of public schools.

And that’s the case with all the other bad ideas out there in the education marketplace. Our critics have an open field for their narrative: education consists of what standardized tests measure; public schools are failing; quality teaching consists simply of improving students’ best test scores; educator unions are an obstacle to school improvement; merit pay offers an opportunity to improve teaching by providing incentives for better teachers, who by definition are the ones who get the highest test scores; by empowering parents and using market forces, school choice can fix an ailing system.

Let me connect the dots of the case I’ve been trying to build.

  • Leadership matters: We’ve had to use every organization tool at our disposal because of a crisis brought on by the election of zealots.
  • Elections matter: Those zealots were elected in part because of lukewarm support among educators and others who felt that he hadn’t been strong enough in support of our causes. (The same sort of lukewarm support being expressed nationally for President Obama.)
  • Ideas matter: Governor Strickland endorsed bogus education “reforms” because the public tends to believe in them. (And on the national level, President Obama has done the same thing.)

If we don’t win the ideological battle, then ultimately we won’t win the organizational and political battles. If we make it through Election Day with the repeal of Senate Bill 5, we need immediately to start figuring out how to counter the tidal wave of opinion that made us such easy targets in the first place.